Comments on: Wonderwall http://notforpaper.com/2009/10/wonderwall/ Posts and observations on some of the most exciting design work for screen. Work best realized away from a printed surface. Sat, 24 Jul 2010 16:34:52 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Sporter http://notforpaper.com/2009/10/wonderwall/#comment-2083 Sporter Sun, 09 May 2010 18:22:40 +0000 http://notforpaper.com/?p=1682#comment-2083 <i>It serves no purpose and adds a layer of noise that the basic tile layout does not need to communicate and interact with.</i> +1 It serves no purpose and adds a layer of noise that the basic tile layout does not need to communicate and interact with.
+1

]]> By: Lukasz http://notforpaper.com/2009/10/wonderwall/#comment-2062 Lukasz Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:40:10 +0000 http://notforpaper.com/?p=1682#comment-2062 i think it's fresh and addicting i think it’s fresh and addicting

]]> By: Craig http://notforpaper.com/2009/10/wonderwall/#comment-2060 Craig Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:22:33 +0000 http://notforpaper.com/?p=1682#comment-2060 I don't think it is using PV3D. I don’t think it is using PV3D.

]]> By: Brady Bone http://notforpaper.com/2009/10/wonderwall/#comment-2034 Brady Bone Fri, 09 Oct 2009 03:09:01 +0000 http://notforpaper.com/?p=1682#comment-2034 Not impressed. It serves no purpose and adds a layer of noise that the basic tile layout does not need to communicate and interact with. - Bone Not impressed.

It serves no purpose and adds a layer of noise that the basic tile layout does not need to communicate and interact with.

- Bone

]]>